1995-96 Finest

The Kevin Garnett rookie. An example of the rookie design and the highlight of the set!

True Innovation: Topps Finest cards were very popular when they debuted.  Known simply as “Finest,” they deserved the labels of “premium” and “super premium” as Topps was innovating the actual card construction. The introduction of what Topps called its “Chromium” technology, gave the cards a unique, metallic shine. What was this technology? I want to draw your attention to a very informative blog post about how these cards were made. The author saw that Chrome printing plates were reversed from regular Topps. So he then took apart a Chrome card, looked up the patents on the back of these Finest cards and discovered that the ink is actually printed behind a clear plastic section that makes the front. This front plastic section is joined to foil, so think of the card as a sandwich…top plastic part, ink underneath that, then a foil part. To show the ink isn’t on the front, he sanded the front and, it scuffs the card, but no ink comes off. He also mentions that the clear, protective coating on these early Finest cards was probably used in the production of later Chrome cards, with the company removing it after printing before packaging. It’s a really cool blog post and really worth a read! And when you look at the patents, you’ll realize just how much effort Topps was putting into this design.

An example of the back of the cards. The #70 Nick Van Exel.

Greening: Unfortunately, with this technology came something we call “greening,” or “Hulking” for a more understanding and accepting tone, with a touch of humor. Unfortunately, there’s not too much known for sure. What have collectors said? One half of a set turned green while the other didn’t. Cards turning green in BGS slabs, a possible issue with the plastic sleeve in the slab? But we’ve seen cards change within PSA slabs too. Cards avoiding greening for 15-18 years and then suddenly, one day, they begin to turn. Cards coming from the pack with some green. There are people who swear that if humidity and light are avoided at all costs, there is no change. But others seem 100% confident that the fate of all early Chromium cards is to eventually turn green. What can we say for sure? First, it never hurts to avoid humidity and sunlight whether this is the solution to greening or not. Many factors probably contribute, but there seems to be a reaction between the ink and other materials in the cards. Changes were made and cards after 1998 aren’t yet affected by this phenomenon. It’s upsetting and is starting to affect valuation.

Reverse of a rookie, same as the base but with collegiate stats.

Structure: 1995-96 Finest came in 24-pack hobby boxes.  Its 251 cards are split into two series. The 140-card first series matches the design to a player’s position (point guard, shooting guard, small forward, power forward, center).  Within this series is a 29-card subset of rookies appearing in draft order starting with the #111 Joe Smith (but note, that the #140 checklist was also accidentally printed with #111). These have an orange border and “NBA 1st Round Draft Pick” on the front.  Finally, a second series of 111 cards consisted of well-known players left out of the earlier series. It’s not as exciting as the first series.  The only rookie is Sasha Danilovic, who somehow didn’t make the rookie subset in Series 1. Another piece of trivia, there is no card #251…the second numbering error in the set in addition to the checklist mentioned above!  But the set is simple, to the point, and collectible.  Finest really complicated the structure in 1996-97 the following year adding levels of rarity and subsets.  So this simple, attractive set is a sort of end of an era.

Front of the #70 Van Exel. An example of the “Point Guard” design in this set. A green background in a blue border.

One last item to discuss is the protective film on these Finest cards.  Whether it’s left on or taken off doesn’t seem to impact value.  Some collectors like the card closer to pack fresh with the film on and don’t want to risk damage when removing it.  It’s intimidating to start picking at the edges or (god forbid!) the corners when attempting to remove it.  But there are good arguments for removing it. The design is busy enough and the film clutters it with “Topps Finest Protector Peel and Remove Coating” scrawled across the front.  Also, when grading with film on, defects on the protector could lower the grade.

Pages for Individual Cards: